Modern science and the universe |
|---|
|
Modern astronomy shows us the model of a universe with a diameter of more than 25 billions lightyears(1 lightyear = 10^13 km) and with the form of a flat ball (infrared background measurement). Until today we know over 1 000 000 000 galaxys or similar objects. In our galaxy are over 1 000 000 000 suns ....
Some mathematicians say that it is statistically absolutely unprobable that
there is life in other parts of the universe (because of the specific conditions
that life needs to exist) - but they forget that we are not probable then too.
But we dont know what is behind that - or whether there is something behind it at all -
and how it came into existence.
Even the "
Relativitätstheorie" of Albert
Einstein is
only one modern and still incomplete model.
Even in
Modern science is now analyzing man down to the genetic level and sees him as a
highly evolved genetic pattern which
needs a society to ensure this evolution which is not possible in the nature but only within
a culture, an education and the safety of a society.
But are we really so modern and progressive ? Modern scientists have found many laws of the material plane and were able to use them for a better life, and we have developed unknown technologies with that - but the majority of mankind lives in concurrence with each other. Mankind has developed its mind but not the soul - which does not exist for science - and which is dying und mostly already has died and exists as a gray shadow. Until some centuries ago western religions beleived that our earth is flat - until Galilei came - as an hereteic. There are theorys that our earth consists of interstellar dust, but the mother(Aurobindo) said that our planet was at first an eruption of gas from our sun. Rodulf Steiner said, that our planetary logos left the sun at that time. Western exoteric religions beleived that the earth is flat, but in the east that was different, because the world views were created by enlightened masters : In trantristic hinduism we find drawings of Lord Krishna who fills out the Universe and is much bigger than the universe on a higher plane of creation, as well as drawings of the "cosmic man".
There are descriptions of stars which circle within 100000s of years around higher systems of stars.
In buddhism exists the teaching of " Microcosm and Macrocosm" :
The world is built up with shells.
Buddhism says that there are millions of universes - like Hinduism does - and tells us about higher worlds as the background of our physical existence.
The eastern religions see man as a carrier of his soul who is bound to his
karma - his destination. They teach methodes to develop the soul and to
liberate it from the influences of the lower planes of creation (Moksha).
There are now new religious christian movements and oriental and asiatic religious movements with millions of people. But these movements are mostly collections of people who flee into religion as a safe place in a too modern and intolerant world. Therefore these movements of mostly simple people do not really change the spiritual climate of our planet. Real religions would lead people on the path to be at least a "spinner of the wheel", but the majority of mankind is sunk in their bodies and does not want this developement.
The further disadvantage of these movements is the modern interpretation of
the scriptures of their founders, which were either written for their specific time
and culture or were symbolic stories of the path.
Many movements have their basis in the interpretations of the successors of
the founder. Therefore these religions give a separatistic feeling of the rebirth
of the specific religion, which is catastrophical for the global understanding
of religion, and which indirectly directs global life into an atheistic direction
because the contents are very infra-rational.
If i speak about science in this chapter, then i think of the universal "
Holy science"
which includes the higher worlds and transcends our material world as the lowest plane.
|
Modern Superstring-Theorie has developed mathematical models which support the "first bang". A disturbance at a point of the universe - eventually in the center of a black hole - in an expanding space is beleived to be the proof for the big bang. (See german " Bild der Wissenschaft 4/2003 ab S.60).
But the model of science is just a false model which unites a summary of measurements and
theories. The big bang in a point is not the big bang of the universe but similar to the
creation of the first particle (ANU/ANTUM) in the old mythologies.
Jesus said : If You could have a beleive like a mustard-corn then You would be able to
move mountains. (The Energie in the ANU is so big that demons in the buddhic plane use it to
for destruction.) If these thing would come into the hands of the military or of greedy people
of the buiseness-world then this would be an unbeleivale danger for mankind.
Therefore the advanced scientists should see their responsibility not to publish the
laws of gravity, but in most cases investors behind the projects want to see the fruits
of their investments.
|